Juvernail
delinquency, a controversal and embarrassing problem to both parents and the
society, has recently instigated pulblic concern nation wide. Some individuals
surely believe that the parents should shoulder the incumbency on raising their
child as an scrupulous honest person, yet others hold the view that it in
school that such kind of liability lies
in. Personally, I reckon that neither the fromer nor the latter assersion is well
founded.
Those
parent-oritened advocaters maintan that unconsipicious as it is, parenting
plays an perfound role in moulding children’s uprightness. In comparation,
schooling is more often symblized as an sancratory for inculating konwledge
rather than a place specialized in raising moral awareness. Besides, parents
themselves are the children’s initial teachers, and they stay with children
during the age of 0 to 6, a critical period when the moral value froms.
On
the contrary, the school-foused individuals argue that the single role that a
school palys as merely teaching konwledge, from which the modern education,
with such versatile function as both knowledge education and moral cultivation,
stems, has been rendered obsolete. What's more, it is incredable for a place
where children spend 16 or more years from his/her 6 to his/her 22 on
education, to escape its resposiblity of fostering upstanding citizens.
As
far as I am concerned, cultivating the descendant should neither be a liability
for familiy nor a obligation for school, neither of which could be responsible
for, hypothetically, the failure in fulfilling their jobs. It shoud be a incumbency
for every single individual who has an esctasy of love to his/her country.
No comments:
Post a Comment