7.Some people believe
that the local government should invest more money in basic facilities and
services like primary education and health care. However, others believe
that the budget should be used in scientific research. Discuss both
sides and give your own opinion.
Opinions regarding
the fiscal decisions made by government vary from one place to another. Some
individuals maintain that more money should be allocated for infrastructures
and essential services such as education and medical care, whereas others argue
that scientific research should be better financed. Both views will be analysed
in this essay before an opinion is constituted.
On the one hand,
advocates for refining infrastructures believe that these basic
facilities are quite essential for improving citizen’s
living standards. Take China for example, numerous rural residents,
particularly those young and geriatric ones, suffer from inadequate living
or medical aid, some of whom even lack food to survive. This example clearly
indicates the urgency for government to allocate funds to tackle this gripping
problem, otherwise scientific research will be of limited value. Thus their
argument is hard to debunk.
On the other hand,
individuals who favour the funding of science defend that input in research
yields untold benefits. For instance, Pfizer, the largest global drug
company, allocate huge amount of money for scientific research in order to
produce better drugs to cure assorted diseases. This example provides ample
justification for attaching priority to research. Consequently, it attracts a
growing number of people to aggregate toward this view.
To recapitulate,
after analysing both sides of the question, it can safely conclude that money
could be spent on scientific research after a basic living standard is
satisfied by local residence. It is predicted that the government’s fund
allocation will be increasingly rational and responsible.
No comments:
Post a Comment