More and more
measures to improve the security in the urban area have been introduced because
of the increased crime. Do the benefits of the measures outweigh the drawbacks?
Nowadays,
with the gunshot incident becoming more and more common, the security in
urban area has aroused public concern nationwide. Consequently, more and more
measures have been taken to solve this problem. I my opinion, however, the
drawbacks far outweigh its benefits.
People
who advocate the existing measures argue that it is the top priority for people
to be alive, suffering from the Sep.11 attacks. They even feel much safer than
before with the current security-guarantee equipment or personnel around them, despite
of numerous inconvenience.
Personally,
although great significance should be attached to secure personal safety, the
measure should not be taken to such an extent that they have an adverse impact
on our life. For example, when we are walking in the street, it is not rare for
us to see the concrete barriers lying along the road in order to prevent a car
bomb, especially near some government places, which sometimes even block the
road for passerby.
Besides,
I reckon that it is these measures that generate an atmosphere of danger rather
than the real situation itself. Urban life used to be a kind of easy and relax,
while today the feeling changed, owing to the enforcement of personnel or electronic
surveillance, which also results in an invasion of privacy.
In
conclusion, as far as I am concerned, the security should not be improved by
such kinds of measures at the cost of inconvenience of public. We would better
tackle this problem in a more rational way, taking both pros and cons into
consideration.
Have lot of home work? Don't wish spending some time on writing? Make use of this essay writing assistance Global Essays. Elegant essay in the short term with warranty!
ReplyDelete