2.Some people student
should learn all the subjects equally at school. However, others believe
that they should learn something they are good at and have interests in.
Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.
Education system
varies from one place to another. Equally varied are the positions people take
on what subjects should be taught. Some individuals argue that it would be
better for students to learn what they are skilled for, while others maintain
that all subjects should be taught. This essay will discuss both point of
views.
People who favour the
unequal emphasis on subjects are based on the notion that not all courses are
essential, especially those science subjects. Take Qian zhongshu, who was a
famous Chinese writer, for example, he only scored 15% in the Mathematics in
College Entrance Examination and was still accepted by Peking University in
1930s. It is readily discernible from this example that one can achieve his potential
even without a well-rounded knowledge. Thus, it is clear why some people
gravitate towards this point of view.
Nevertheless,
opponents believe that those individuals are minority, and it would be
detrimental to the majority should they only focus on the subjects they
interested in. For instance, most young people cannot decide what their occupations
will be, and there is high chance that their interests might vary as they grow.
Consequently, it is vital for them to have a sound fundamental knowledge
beforehand. Therefore, this argument is hard to debunk.
To recapitulate, after
analysing the two arguments above, it is clear that the second point of view is
more plausible for the majority. Consequently, it is assumed that most
educational institutions, especially primary ones, will emphasis equally on all
subjects.
No comments:
Post a Comment